On Wednesday mornings, 30 men meet at San Quentin’s Chapel C, a clean and squat building in the prison’s airy courtyard. Walking past the pond and fountain, the neatly manicured lawn and palm trees, they file into an empty room and arrange their chairs in a circle, strumming guitars as they go.
The group is an unlikely one. A deaf rapper who goes by Westbird sits in the corner, communicating via interpreter and tablet. A musician of 45 years who studied at Ecuador’s national conservatory quietly takes notes on my right. A former member of the Manson Family, now 82, chats with me about Bob Dylan and how Los Angeles has changed since the 1960s. After class, he shows me a crisp photo of his fiancée he keeps in his wallet.
Despite their diverse backgrounds, these men have one thing in common: They all come to the chapel to write music that helps them cope with the trauma of incarceration.
In Essence Goldman’s program, “Believe Music Heals,” the Bay Area recording artist provides weekly songwriting prompts that encourage students to explore this pain and healing process.
Some participants have been incarcerated for decades, and they told me this class pushes them to think about their past, the prison system and rehabilitation in a new light.
On April 9, one participant serving time for murder, Steve, shared a song written from the perspective of his victim’s daughter. He said class gave him "the chance to dig out a demon I’ve carried for 48 years.”
San Quentin's courtyard and Chapel C.
(photo courtesy of CDCR)
Another, named Luis, broke down in tears singing about the inescapable loneliness in his cell. Davis wrote about a dream he had of his mother confronting him at his victim’s grave more than 50 years after the crime, and the group helped him work out the melody.
“We’re like a little family in here now,” Tucker, a student, said. “Sometimes I feel like I’m forgotten about… this gives me hope.”
Programs like this make the prison unique. San Quentin, once notorious for being the state’s oldest prison and housing some of America’s most infamous criminals, is now considered a model of incarceration for its progressive culture and wealth of opportunities.
In 2023, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would transform the prison into a flagship for the California Model, his statewide plan to make correctional facilities more rehabilitative based on Norwegian prisons.
In addition to Goldman’s class, San Quentin hosts the most coveted education, art and rehabilitation programming in the California prison system. Mount Tamalpais College is the first independent liberal arts institution dedicated specifically to serving incarcerated students, and provides associate’s degree programs at no cost to participants, according to its website. The prison is also home to the San Quentin News, a nonprofit paper run by its residents with a circulation of 35,000. Incarcerated reporters regularly cover events such as the San Quentin Film Festival, the first of its kind to be held inside a prison. The William James Association (WJA) offers a variety of arts courses to residents, including printmaking, creative writing and painting.
“It gave me a place to settle down. It gave me a place to take time, to find myself, a place to get away from all the … ruckus,” said Isiah Daniels, a former San Quentin resident who now serves on the WJA Alumni Advisory Committee. “There was still junk going on, and the fighting and the behaviors, and I was just trying to find this place to get away. And so I went to the William James.”
These programs are often a first step to rehabilitation during incarceration, but San Quentin residents have to wait months, sometimes years, for a chance to get into them. Budget cuts have left those formerly funded by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to survive off external donors and volunteers, with limited staff and supplies. Others, like “Believe Music Heals,” were never supported by the department in the first place.
Students participate in a William James Association art class at San Quentin. (photo by Peter Merts)
Enter Newsom
In March of 2023, the governor’s initiative to improve California prisons started with San Quentin, allocating $360 million for its transformation. It looked like a chance to get money back to arts and education programs. The state prison was renamed San Quentin Rehabilitation Center, and the unit known as Death Row was phased out, as inmates sentenced to death were transferred to the general population in other prisons.
The governor assembled a 21-member advisory council for the transformation, consisting of political allies, correctional officials, programmers and formerly incarcerated people, and the group produced a 157-page report outlining 10 lead recommendations for Newsom’s plan.
Alongside highlighting the importance of funding programming, the group suggested several crucial and long-overdue changes. One was improving what correctional officers receive for training, which the report described as “punitive, authoritative” and “toxic.” Another was ending double-celling, which leaves two grown men at San Quentin crammed into 46 square feet of living space — less than the legal requirement for farm animals in California under Proposition 12.
LEAD RECOMMENDATIONS
as outlined by Newsom's advisory council
in their January 2024 report
1. PROVIDE EVERY RESIDENT WITH A REHABILITATION & REENTRY PLAN AND A REENTRY SUPPORT TEAM FROM DAY ONE.
The Rehabilitation and Reentry Plan should have broad focus, from healthcare and substance use treatment to training for employment and preparation for community supervision (parole or probation). It should be updated regularly in collaboration with a Rehabilitation Team of trained staff and peer-mentors who are deeply familiar with rehabilitation opportunities at San Quentin and beyond.
2. OPTIMIZE EDUCATION, JOB READINESS, AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMMING.
Every resident should have the opportunity to meet their educational and treatment needs. Therefore, establish an Office of the Associate Warden of Programs to assess program quality and integrate programming and custody operations. Hire more teachers, facilitators and peer mentors, and establish the infrastructure and continued funding for CBOs to offer rehabilitation and reentry programming throughout CDCR. Increase use and breadth of restorative justice programming with victims/survivors, family members, and the San Quentin community. Prioritize workforce programs that connect people to post-release jobs.
3. EVOLVE THE TRAINING FOR CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS TO CREATE A MORE REHABILITATIVE CULTURE.
Correctional officer and all staff training must extend beyond a focus on security and maintaining order to include equal amounts of training in rehabilitation, normalization, behavior change, trauma-informed care, and interpersonal or “dynamic” security.
4. REDUCE THE POPULATION SIGNIFICANTLY TO END DOUBLE-CELLING, AND TO ENSURE GREATER ACCESS TO REHABILITATIVE PROGRAMS.
San Quentin, with a design capacity of 3,084, currently houses 3,447 people. Reduce the population to allow for single occupancy cells and no bunk beds, and greater access to programming. Beyond San Quentin, continue to reduce California’s prison population. Closing down of prisons must be met with population reduction to avoid overcrowding of other facilities.
5. ELIMINATE “DEATH ROW” AND REPLACE IT WITH DIGNIFIED HOUSING.
Permanently shut down “death row.” Evaluate options to create improved housing in its stead, such as replacing the decrepit East Block with innovative modular housing or renovating it to be more conducive to rehabilitation. This should be part of a longer-term effort to create more dignified housing throughout San Quentin.
6. REDUCE PRISON BEDS IN FAVOR OF PRE-RELEASE REENTRY BEDS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY.
Transformational reentry requires creating successful pathways to the community. Reduce CDCR prison beds and add pre-reentry beds (“MCRP” beds) that are independently owned and managed by community-based organizations (CBOs). Consider establishing one or two 200-person reentry campuses on San Quentin’s property (outside prison walls) with the highest priority given to San Quentin residents. Dedicate some of these beds, and others throughout the state, to provide residential reentry services to those who are released after serving long sentences.
7. THE CONSTRUCTION COST OF THE NEW BUILDING 38 SHOULD BE CUT BY AT LEAST ONE THIRD.
Legislature has funded a new Building 38 which will increase access to rehabilitative programs and services. In the new building, prioritize spaces for education and job training and reduce the cost by at least one third.
8. REDIRECT THE REMAINING FUNDS (AT LEAST $120M) TO CAMPUS UPGRADES THAT NORMALIZE THE ENVIRONMENT.
Use saved capital improvement funds to update/transform other spaces (e.g., store, café, town square, family visitation areas, housing improvements) to allow residents to engage in more “normal” interactions and life activities.
9. IMPROVE STAFF HOUSING AND WORK SPACE.
Many staff (including custody, healthcare, teachers, and others) have unreasonable commutes and some live in substandard trailers on San Quentin property. Improve the staff’s trailer grounds and introduce work space improvements such as break rooms and staff showers at San Quentin.
10. ENSURE ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN SAN QUENTIN’S TRANSFORMATION.
Establish a program team and a series of longer-term project-specific advisory boards to consider and help operationalize the efforts recommended in this report. Ensure all shareholders, including staff, victims/survivors and San Quentin residents, have a voice and window into the implementation of this project and its impact on public safety.
But two years later, the vast majority of the money allocated for Newsom’s transformation project isn’t actually going to any of this. The budget is instead going to the demolition and reconstruction of Building 38, a 70,000-square-foot former furniture warehouse at San Quentin that will be rebuilt as a new “educational and vocational center” slated to open next March.
Newsom’s complex will comprise three buildings, according to CDCR: A new technology and media center, a library and a “multipurpose gathering space,” with a cafe and store. Each building includes “general classrooms” which will reportedly triple the prison’s programming space.
Kevin Shepler, who has been incarcerated at San Quentin since January of 2024, sent me a letter the same week I visited Goldman’s class. We had previously corresponded about Newsom’s transformation and his experience at San Quentin as an artist. He said he signed up for painting, drawing, piano and guitar classes the same month he arrived, and more than a year later has yet to secure a spot, likely due to these budget and space constraints.
He called the focus on rehabilitation at San Quentin largely a “farce,” and criticized mainstream media for “interviewing the hand-picked ‘yes-men’ inmates” about the transformation project.
“I am a fiscally conservative man, and don’t believe taxpayers’ money is being spent wisely, especially when it comes to the judicial and prison systems,” he wrote. “That said, I believe that the money spent on arts in prisons has more positive rewards than many other programs in here.”
Shepler, like many of the more than 40 members of the San Quentin community I interviewed, is not convinced that Building 38 would further his or his peers’ rehabilitation. Why not support stretched-thin programming instead?
Meet the San Quentin community
Jody Lewen is the president of Mount Tamalpais College and served on Newsom’s advisory council. While she said the college has been promised more classrooms in Building 38, she’s not holding her breath — according to Lewen, they haven’t been told how much space they’ll have, and are receiving no new funding from the project’s budget.
“I think I was somewhat naive going into it. But one of the things I've learned is that often, with large-scale initiatives, the impetus is primarily political,” Lewen said about her experience as an advisory council member. “I realized that it’s almost a branding opportunity, more than a material intention.”
The advisory board had no tangible power to change construction plans, and there was no obligation to follow their guidance. Lewen authored another report titled "Operationalizing Transformation" urging Newsom to rethink Building 38, and instead invest those resources into current programming and infrastructure to avoid environmental and financial consequences. That recommendation was also not followed.
Other rehabilitative programmers said they feel similarly left behind by the California Model. Henry Frank, who was released from San Quentin in 2013, is the communications administrator at the William James Association. He said the brunt of the rehabilitative work at San Quentin is placed on external programmers, not the department.
“They're heavily leaning on the community-based organizations to pick up that slack because they're not qualified to do it,” he said. “They're the captors. They're the ones who are enforcing these laws that they put into place for people to behave accordingly.”
Students at a WJA origami class at San Quentin. (photo by Peter Merts)
The WJA Alumni Advisory Committee, a group of formerly incarcerated people who participated in the association’s classes in prison, meets monthly. In their March meeting, past San Quentin residents strongly opposed Newsom’s plan.
“The Newsom stuff and the California Model, that's politics. The art room, Arts in Corrections, to people who participate in it, that's spiritual. That's church,” Felix Lucero, formerly incarcerated at San Quentin, said.
In 2010, the CDCR entirely halted funding for Arts in Corrections, the program that supported the WJA. When this funding was cut, long term research had already been published showing that Arts in Corrections programs reduced rule violations by 65% and saved the CDCR hundreds of thousands of measurable dollars. The WJA survived for several years off private donors until Arts in Corrections was reinstated, but has since operated in a far more limited capacity.
Even those in favor of Newsom’s transformation plan recognize its weaknesses. Ron Broomfield, former San Quentin warden and director of adult institutions for the CDCR, is a staunch defender of the California Model and its goals. In separate conversations with current and former residents and programmers, they praised Broomfield as someone devoted to rehabilitation and improving California’s prison system. He said that, although he was excited about the demolition and construction project, he recognizes there are more pressing issues at the prison.
“We're going to have this gorgeous rehabilitative center, and then we're going to send people back to housing units that were built almost 100 years ago and were not designed for rehabilitation, were not designed for dignity, were not designed for safety,” he said.
What happens next?
Since the advisory report was published, the budget for the San Quentin transformation was reduced to $239 million, and the Legislative Analyst’s office has twice criticized the project for having “no clear objectives or plans.” Still, construction is set to be completed on January 17 of next year, according to the CDCR contractual milestone.
Some worry that this costly building project may jeopardize the future of San Quentin when a new governor takes office in 2027. Newsom is at the end of his second term, and voters will choose a replacement next fall.
“Given the times we're in, financially, politically, budgetarily, it's very hard for me to imagine any politician after Newsom being willing to advocate for this type of major public investment in a single prison,” Lewen said. “My concern is also that somebody will come after Newsom and scrutinize closely how this money was actually spent … and use that to delegitimize the whole project of San Quentin.”
Others have criticized the building as a political move, something Newsom can use as publicity for a 2028 presidential run. By focusing resources on construction at San Quentin, which is already considered a model, the transformation would create a showpiece for him while leaving behind problems and facilities that need more attention.
A note left by an incarcerated person on the south wall of San Quentin before it was demolished to make way for Newsom's building complex. (photo courtesy of CDCR)
“We are literally tearing down walls to reimagine our prison system, incentivize true rehabilitation, and end cycles of violence and crime. Brick by brick, we’re building a new future that will make all of us safer,” said Newsom in an August 2024 press release announcing the completion of Building 38’s demolition.
According to Olivia Gleason with Californians United for a Responsible Budget, it would cost $20 billion to reproduce the changes at San Quentin at every California state prison. Even if San Quentin is meant to be the first step towards statewide incarceration reform, its transformation is nearly impossible to replicate.
Edwin Chavez is a current resident at San Quentin, and has been incarcerated at 13 California correctional facilities over the last 30 or so years. He said that in his experience, rehabilitation comes from within — not from a new building.
“It doesn't matter if you spend trillions of dollars when it comes down to reform and rehabilitation. It doesn't matter if you tell the world that we're the California Model, we're the best prison,” Chavez said in a March phone call from San Quentin. “At the end of the day, I still don't have the space to have a voice like the average citizen does."
As Newsom’s building project chugs along, Goldman’s students from the “Believe Music Heals” program are working on their second album. Each participant records their best song from their weekly workshops, all focused on a unifying theme. Last year's was "The Heart of San Quentin."
The program’s pilot album featured 30 songs, which they had to record on cassette tapes because they couldn’t get modern equipment cleared by security in time. Due to CDCR approval hurdles, the material is still unreleased, but Goldman hopes to one day share the songs with the public and donate the proceeds to charity.
Rick Otto, who has served 19 and a half years of his life sentence, already knows the song he’s putting on this next record — a country ballad titled "Home." He debuted it in class on April 9 to raucous applause.
“I hope you don’t think this is weird man, but I think I just fell in love,” one student told Otto after his performance.
How would you change San Quentin
with $239 million?
I asked interviewees what they would fix with $239 million to improve conditions at San Quentin. Nobody said they would construct a new building. They identified four primary issues, many of which were addressed in the initial 2023 advisory council report. If a politician asked the San Quentin community what they needed, here's what they would say.
Photo by Bonaru Richardson
Jody Lewen
Founder and president of Mount Tamalpais College
“I would have repaired failing infrastructure, plumbing, HVAC. You have housing units with no air conditioning at all. Plumbing is failing, the walls are crumbling. And I would have renovated a bunch of different spaces to increase programming space... or built a series of smaller buildings that didn't require the demolition of anything.”
Photo courtesy of Henry Frank
Henry Frank
Communications administrator at the WJA
Former San Quentin resident
“First of all, it would be with the correctional officers and staff, giving them... equity training and cultural training, at least some kind of counseling background, a year or two in there. Because rehabilitation, I mean, that's everything. To help a person change, if they're inside or out, wherever they are. And it has to be across the board. It has to start with administration up on top, so it will trickle down.”
Photo courtesy of Gabe Singer
Gabe Singer
Member of the WJA Alumni Advisory Committee
Former San Quentin resident
“If I was Gavin Newsom, I would take California out of the federal standard and bring back the inmate Bill of Rights... Right now, no matter what California Model, what rehabilitation program you have, we're still structured under a huge federal standard, and we have no rights. We might have visiting, but that's a privilege. A phone call is a privilege. The tablet is a privilege. Program is a privilege. It shouldn't be a privilege.”
Photo courtesy of
the San Quentin News
Kevin Shepler
Currently incarcerated at San Quentin
“Cellys are killing each other and overdoses are plenty,” he wrote in a March letter. “Although the inmate population seems to take the blame for this, anyone with an ounce of intelligence can figure out how these drugs are being supplied to the addicts within the dismal razor wire fence.”